As our coastal sites turn green this morning and we start to see hope for clean air for the rest of us later today and tomorrow, I thought I’d take a minute to clarify some common misconceptions regarding air quality numbers, where they come from and what they mean to you. The two indices, Air Quality Index (AQI) vs. Washington Air Quality Advisory (WAQA), have created a lot of confusion.
Both AQI and WAQA are a unitless index calculated from a
given concentration of air pollution. There are several different measured
pollutants that affect air quality: PM2.5, ozone, NOx, CO, and SO2. PM2.5 is
the most commonly measured and generally the one of most concern in Washington
state, especially during wildfire smoke episodes. Although all these pollutants
can affect AQI and WAQA values, I’m only going to focus on PM2.5 in this post.
State and Federal government run air quality maps (https://airnow.gov and https://enviwa.ecology.wa.gov/home/map) use the same air quality monitors and data to
determine air quality in your area, but they use a different index to represent
what that air quality means for your health.
So, why are there two different indices? Although we assign breakpoints to the different categories, air quality is a spectrum. Every person will be affected by poor air quality differently. These are general guidelines and the breakpoints are based on statistical assessments of how large numbers of people respond to varying levels of poor air quality. EPA studies have assigned risk at a certain point, while Washington state toxicology research found more protective levels would better serve our community. Looking at the breakpoints in this table, a PM2.5 concentration equal to 50 ug/m3 is considered unhealthy by WAQA standards, but unhealthy for sensitive groups when using the AQI scale. You are not a statistic and may be adversely affected at moderate levels, or perhaps you can go hiking without difficulty when conditions are unhealthy for sensitive groups. For individual health concerns, your best bet is to consult your doctor.
AQI and WAQA health risk categories are based on a 24-hour
exposure. The number you see on the map is updated hourly and represents the
previous hourly average weighted by the air quality observed over several hours
before. For example, if the air quality is green all morning and a nearby
building catches on fire, smoke may affect the monitor for one or two hours at
unhealthy (red) levels, before returning to green. The monitor may only show
unhealthy for sensitive groups (orange) during those two hours since the exposure
time was so short. As we observed at the beginning of this smoke event, heavy
smoke rolled into some areas very quickly and air quality went from good to
hazardous in 30 minutes. The map will not update that value until the hour of
data collection is complete and may take another hour or two to catch up to instantaneous
air quality. Both airnow and the state maps have the option to look at the
actual hourly PM2.5 concentration from the previous hour. Those numbers will be
the same on both maps.
The second question we often get is “who is more
trustworthy? My air quality app, a third-party air quality reporting site,
airnow, or the state air quality map”? It is important to understand all these
sites are using the same data, if they are using actual air quality
measurements. We don’t often know how third-party apps and websites calculate
the AQI or interpret our data. In that sense, we consider EPA and the state map
to be the gold standard as we are directly involved in collecting the data,
making sure it’s valid, and reporting the concentrations.











